I got in an Aston House BC (Backcountry) in Coyote and thought I’d do a quick side-by-side comparison for those who may be looking at both packs or for Connor owners considering an upgrade.
The Aston House BC, which measures 21″ H x 11″ W x 8″ D, is a larger pack than the Connor. Spec-wise, HPG says they are the same height and width. They may be but the Aston House seemed a bit taller to me. They do appear to be the same width.
The Aston House BC does have a larger harness and a dual stay frame sheet compared to the single stay in the Connor. The Aston House also has a padded back panel for added comfort.
The biggest difference is the depth. The Aston House BC is twice as deep as the Connor; 8″ versus 4″, which equates to an extra 23 Liters in volume.

Both packs are compressed , but you can clearly see the difference in depth when they are laid side-by-side.
Hopefully that will give you an idea on the size difference. I haven’t decided whether to replace the Connor with this new pack. But I’m leaning that way. I like the ability to add external pouches on the BC’s hypalon Aston Panel. I dug out the Zulu Nylon Gear Mega Admin Pouch, which is a past favorite, and mounted it. It’s a perfect complement to the Backcountry if you like external admin pouches. The Mega Admin Pouch is particularly cool because it has its own paracord suspension system.
I also like having extra capacity in the main compartment while keeping the option of compressing things down when I don’t need it. The Connor is a low profile pack, which makes it a bit limited because of its shallow depth.
Obviously, what I’m showing here isn’t my full kit. I need to load up the Aston House BC up to see how it handles the weight. But, if it performs like it’s smaller sibling, then I might just have found a new trail pack.
The Aston House BC retails for $280 and is available here. Stay tuned for a full review!
The post Hill People Gear Connor and Aston House BC Side-by-Side Comparison appeared first on .